DPIA Generator
Screen it, describe it, rate the risks and sign it off, in the steps of the ICO template.
Try before you buy.
- Free preview: every page with your details, the first part of the wording readable and the rest hidden, marked “MySmartCoPilot preview · not for use”.
- Locked until you unlock it: download, copy and print.
- Unlock: Premium pass, ₹799 for 30 days or ₹249 for 1 week, a one-time payment that never renews. Unlock: Premium pass, $19.99 for 30 days or $7.99 for 1 week, a one-time payment that never renews.
Ways to unlock shows how to get the full result.
Printing this result is locked in the free preview.
Checks
Preview
Highlighted hints mark fields you have not filled in; downloads and printouts show a blank line there instead. To print, choose your printer or “Save as PDF” and turn off “Headers and footers”.
Locked in the free preview. Opens the ways to unlock this result.
Locked in the free preview. Batch runs unlock with a pass.
Locked in the free preview. Query results unlock with a pass.
For general information only, not legal advice. Templates are generic starting points — have a qualified lawyer review anything you rely on.
How this tool is checked
- Sources
-
This guide lists 4 sources under ‘Official sources’, among them:
- Tests
- 21 automated tests check its results.
- Found an error?
- Report a problem or write to support@mysmartcopilot.com, with what you entered and the result you expected.
About the DPIA Generator
A data protection impact assessment (DPIA) is required before processing that is likely to result in a high risk to people’s rights and freedoms — always for large-scale special category data, systematic monitoring of public places and automated decisions with significant effects (GDPR Article 35). It describes the processing, tests its necessity and proportionality, assesses the risks and records the measures that address them.
Start with the screening: the three cases of Article 35(3), the nine criteria of the European guidelines (WP 248) — two or more mean a DPIA in most cases — the ICO’s own list for the UK, and the yearly DPIA of an Indian Significant Data Fiduciary. Then build the assessment in the seven steps of the ICO’s template: the need, the description, consultation, necessity and proportionality, a risk register with each risk rated for likelihood and severity before and after the measures on the ICO’s matrix, and the sign-off with the DPO’s advice. A high residual risk is flagged for prior consultation with the supervisory authority (Article 36). The free preview shows every page with your answers and the first part of the wording; a Premium pass unlocks the DOCX and PDF.
How to use it
- Tick the law and answer the screening: Article 35(3), the nine criteria, any special category data, and — in the UK — the ICO’s list. The result says whether a DPIA is required, and why.
- Name the project, the controller, the DPO and who carries out the assessment.
- Describe the nature, scope, context and purposes of the processing, and who you consulted.
- Answer the necessity and proportionality questions, starting with the lawful basis and, for special category data, the Article 9 condition.
- Add each risk — or start from a common one — rate it, add the measures and the residual rating, and fill in the sign-off. With a Premium pass, download the DOCX or PDF; without one, the preview shows the pages marked.
Examples
Systematic monitoring, sensitive data, vulnerable people (employees) and an innovative technology ticked · three risks
Screening: required in most cases (4 of the 9 criteria). Two risks rated high before the measures — health data used against employees, a breach at the vendor — and low after them, so the processing may proceed once the measures are in place.
Residual likelihood probable, severity severe, effect “accepted”
Residual risk high: the check and the outcome say the processing cannot start until the supervisory authority has been consulted under Article 36(1).
UK GDPR · the ICO’s list: biometric data · criterion: innovative technology
Required: the ICO lists biometrics as needing a DPIA when combined with a criterion of the European guidelines, which is the case here.
Common uses
- A product team launching an app that profiles users or uses location, health or biometric data.
- An employer bringing in monitoring, wellbeing or access-control technology for staff.
- A DPO screening new projects and keeping a record of why some need no DPIA.
- An Indian Significant Data Fiduciary preparing its yearly assessment.
When a DPIA is required
- Article 35(3) names three cases: a systematic and extensive evaluation of people, based on automated processing including profiling, on which decisions with legal or similarly significant effects are based; processing special category or criminal data on a large scale; and systematic monitoring of a publicly accessible area on a large scale.
- The European guidelines add nine criteria: evaluation or scoring; automated decisions with legal or similar effect; systematic monitoring; sensitive or highly personal data; large scale; matching or combining datasets; vulnerable people such as children, employees or patients; innovative technology; processing that prevents people from using a right, a service or a contract. In most cases two criteria mean a DPIA is needed; sometimes one is enough (WP 248).
- Each supervisory authority publishes a list of its own (Article 35(4)). The ICO’s list has five kinds of processing that need a DPIA on their own — such as large-scale profiling, data matching or targeting children — and five that need one together with a criterion, such as biometrics, genetic data or tracking.
- If you decide no DPIA is needed, record why. Carry it out before the processing starts and review it when the risk changes (Article 35(11)).
What the assessment contains
- A systematic description of the processing and its purposes, including any legitimate interest pursued (Article 35(7)(a)).
- An assessment of its necessity and proportionality: the lawful basis, whether it achieves the purpose, less intrusive alternatives, data minimisation, the information given to people, their rights, processors and transfers (Article 35(7)(b)).
- An assessment of the risks to people’s rights and freedoms (Article 35(7)(c)) and the measures to address them, with safeguards and security (Article 35(7)(d)).
- The advice of the data protection officer (Article 35(2)) and, where appropriate, the views of the people affected or their representatives (Article 35(9)).
Rating the risks
Each risk gets a likelihood of harm — remote, possible or probable — and a severity — minimal, significant or severe. The overall risk follows the matrix of the ICO’s DPIA guidance: a remote harm or a minimal one is low risk; a possible harm of significant severity is medium; a possible severe harm, or a probable harm that is significant or severe, is high. After the measures, the residual risk is rated the same way. If a high residual risk remains and you accept it, you must consult the supervisory authority before the processing starts (Article 36(1)) — in the UK, the ICO.
India: Significant Data Fiduciaries
Under the DPDP Act, 2023 a Significant Data Fiduciary carries out a periodic DPIA — describing the rights of Data Principals and the purpose of processing, and assessing and managing the risk to those rights (section 10(2)(c)). The DPDP Rules require it, with an audit, once in every twelve months from notification, and a report of the significant observations to the Data Protection Board (rule 13).
Official sources
- Regulation (EU) 2016/679 (GDPR) — Articles 35 and 36
- WP 248 rev.01: guidelines on DPIAs — the nine criteria
- ICO: how do we do a DPIA? and when do we need to do a DPIA?
- Digital Personal Data Protection Act, 2023 and DPDP Rules, 2025
Limitations
- A structured template, not legal advice: the answers, ratings and decisions are yours and your DPO’s.
- Supervisory authorities’ own lists differ from country to country: check the list of the authority for your country (the tool includes the ICO’s).
- It does not replace a security risk assessment or a transfer risk assessment; refer to them in the answers where they exist.
- The Indian section describes the duties of a notified Significant Data Fiduciary; which fiduciaries are notified, and any data to be kept in India, depend on government notifications.
Privacy
On this device; its files download once
Everything happens in your browser. Your project details and risk register are not uploaded or stored by MySmartCoPilot. If you tick Keep a draft in this browser, the form is saved in this browser’s local storage until you untick it.
Frequently asked questions
What do I get without a pass?
Without a pass, DPIA Generator shows every page with your details, the first part of the wording readable and the rest hidden, marked “MySmartCoPilot preview · not for use”. Until you unlock it, the result can’t be downloaded, copied or printed. A Premium or Ultimate pass, a one-time payment that never renews, unlocks the full result. The pricing page lists the passes and their prices.
When is a DPIA mandatory?
Before any processing likely to result in a high risk to people’s rights and freedoms, and always in the three cases of Article 35(3): automated evaluation with significant effects, large-scale special category or criminal data, and large-scale monitoring of public places. In practice, two or more of the nine criteria of the European guidelines mean a DPIA in most cases.
What happens if the risk stays high?
Reduce it with more measures if you can. If you accept a high residual risk, you must consult the supervisory authority before starting (Article 36(1)), and give it the DPIA.
Who carries out the DPIA?
The controller is responsible, even when someone else does the work. It must seek the advice of its data protection officer, if it has one (Article 35(2)), and its processors must help (Article 28(3)(f)).
Is a DPIA the same as a privacy impact assessment?
Broadly yes: “privacy impact assessment” is an older, more general name for the same kind of exercise. Under the GDPR, a DPIA has at least the content Article 35(7) lists.
How is the overall risk worked out?
From the likelihood and the severity of harm, with the ICO’s matrix: remote or minimal is low; possible and significant is medium; possible and severe, or probable and significant or severe, is high.