Tech Interview Preparation Module 6 – Live coding and practical rounds
AI in interviews: banned, allowed or expected
Find each employer's AI rule for applications, take-homes, assessments and live rounds, do well where AI is allowed, and know how hiring AI is regulated.
What you will learn
- Find and follow each employer's AI-tool rules for every stage of its process
- Prepare for a round that allows AI while keeping ownership of every line
- Use AI to prepare without crossing into dishonesty
- Explain how assessments flag unauthorised tools and how laws regulate AI that screens candidates
Before you start
What you’ll learn · Before you start
What you will learn
- Find and follow each employer's AI-tool rules for every stage of its process
- Prepare for a round that allows AI while keeping ownership of every line
- Use AI to prepare without crossing into dishonesty
- Explain how assessments flag unauthorised tools and how laws regulate AI that screens candidates
Before you start
On this page
Ask five employers or platforms whether you may use an AI assistant in a coding round, and you get three answers. Google says AI tools are not permitted during its interviews. Microsoft encourages responsible use while you prepare but expects your own skills in assessments and interviews unless a round explicitly permits AI. Canva expects its backend, machine learning and frontend candidates to use AI tools in technical interviews. The rule also changes with the stage, so the real question is whether AI is allowed in this stage, by this employer, in writing.
Employers’ and platforms’ own pages answer it stage by stage, and official pages also cover rounds that allow AI, how assessments flag unauthorised tools, how laws treat AI that screens you and where honest preparation ends.
Banned, allowed or expected: the rule depends on employer and stage
The pages quoted here give one of three answers, and some give different answers for different stages:
| Employer or platform | Preparing | Assessments | Live interviews |
|---|---|---|---|
| Not covered here | Not covered here | Not permitted | |
| Meta | Not covered here | Not covered here | No unauthorised outside help, AI tools included |
| Microsoft | Encouraged, used responsibly | Your own skills, unless explicitly permitted | Your own skills, unless explicitly permitted |
| Canva | Not covered here | Not covered here | Expected for backend, machine learning and frontend roles |
| CodeSignal’s GCA | Not covered here | Not allowed, even for syntax look-ups | Not covered here |
Banned means the round tests you without help: Google’s tips put it as wanting your thoughts, not those of the internet, your friends or AI. Allowed means allowed only where a round says so, as Microsoft’s page does. Expected means the round is built around the tools: Canva redesigned its questions to be more complex, ambiguous and realistic. Of the five, three forbid AI in the stage they describe, one allows it only with explicit permission, and one expects it. A cell that the page does not cover is a question for the recruiter, asked before the stage, in writing.
What comes next builds on the table. In a round that allows AI, the evidence is your judgement over its output. Assessment platforms say they flag unauthorised tools and actions such as switching tabs. Laws in some places regulate AI that screens candidates, and honest preparation with AI has a clear line: it may train you, never stand in for you.
Checkpoint
Check: Banned, allowed or expected
Ask for the rule of each stage, in writing Pro: opens with a Pro, Premium or Ultimate pass
In this part:
- A round that allows AI: plan, prompt, read, test, explain
- How assessments flag tools they do not allow
- When AI screens you: what the law and the employers say
- Preparing with AI, honestly
- Practise: twelve scenarios
- Interview questions
- May you use AI tools in a coding interview?
- A round lets you use an AI coding assistant. The interviewer says they care about your engineering, not your prompting. How do you run the round so they can see it?
- In a round that allows AI, the assistant suggests an overlap check for bookings that looks right and passes your first example. How do you decide whether to trust it?
- A take-home brief says nothing about AI tools. You used one to write test scaffolding before realising the rules were unclear. What do you do?
- Key takeaways
1 diagram · 3 interview answers · about 26 minutes
Opening this part with your pass…
This part opens with any MySmartCoPilot pass.
- Pro pass · 1 week₹79$2.99
- 30 days₹179$5.99
- 1 year₹1,699$45
One payment; a pass never renews. The price shown is the total you pay: no fees or charges are added at checkout.
Passes can’t be bought right now, so this part can’t be opened at the moment. The free part above stands on its own. If you have a pass, enter your licence key.
It also opens every other in-depth part in Learn and every Pro tool. Sales are final, except where the law gives you a right to withdraw, for example in the EU and the UK (refund policy).
Terms in this lesson
- bias audit
- An independent evaluation of whether a hiring tool treats groups of candidates unequally, for example by sex or by race and ethnicity.
References
- How we hire (Google Careers)
- Interviewing at Google: best practices, advice and tips (Google Careers)
- Software Engineer Full Loop Interview Guide (linked from the onsite preparation page) (Meta Careers)
- Hiring tips: responsible use of AI, honest representation and the match indicator (Microsoft Careers)
- Yes, you can use AI in our interviews. In fact, we insist (Canva Engineering)
- AI interview success: an interviewer's inside guide (Canva Engineering)
- General Coding Assessment (GCA) rules and setup (CodeSignal Support)
- Proctor Mode (HackerRank Support)
- Automated employment decision tools (Local Law 144) (NYC Department of Consumer and Worker Protection)
- AI Act: the regulatory framework for AI (European Commission)
Report a problem with this lesson
Kept only in this browser. Your Learn progress