Your country

Tools that support it use your country for local currency, number formats, units and paper size. Your choice is saved only in this browser.

Type a name or a two-letter code. Use the up and down arrow keys to move through the countries, Enter to choose one and Escape to close.

Wells Score, PERC & Geneva Calculator

Pre-test probability of PE or DVT, with each rule’s published risk groups.

Health No upload Works offline Free, no sign-up

Rule and criteria

Clinical rule

Pre-test probability of pulmonary embolism (PE) in a patient with suspected PE.

Tick what applies
Wells score for pulmonary embolism 0 points (of 12.5)

PE unlikely

What the result means

Next step

      Criteria present

      For clinicians. These rules estimate pre-test probability in patients in whom PE or DVT is already suspected; they support, and do not replace, clinical judgement and local pathways. A patient who is unstable needs emergency care, not a score.

      Next steps

      For general information only, not medical advice. Consult a qualified health professional for advice about your situation.

      About the Wells Score, PERC & Geneva Calculator

      Four bedside rules for suspected venous thromboembolism, each as a checklist with its published points and risk groups:

      • the Wells score for pulmonary embolism (PE), in its two-level form (PE likely or unlikely, as NICE uses it) and its three-level form;
      • the PERC rule, which rules out PE without a D-dimer test when clinical suspicion is already low;
      • the revised Geneva score, built from objective findings only, with its simplified one-point-per-item version;
      • the Wells score for deep vein thrombosis (DVT).

      Tick what applies and the result updates at once, with what the source studies found in each group and the next step in NICE guideline NG158. It is written for clinicians; nothing you tick leaves your browser.

      How to use it

      1. Choose the rule: Wells PE, PERC, Geneva or Wells DVT. A link ending in #perc, #geneva, #wells-pe or #wells-dvt opens that rule directly.
      2. Tick every criterion that is present. The points are shown beside each one; the Geneva heart rate is a choice of three bands.
      3. Read the total, the two-level and three-level result and the next step NICE NG158 recommends for that result. The highlighted row in each table is this patient.
      4. Use Copy result to paste the score, the criteria present and the next step into your notes.

      Examples

      Wells PE: leg swelling with deep-vein tenderness, heart rate 112
      Result
      3 + 1.5 = 4.5 points — PE likely (more than 4); three-level moderate (16.2% had PE). NICE: CTPA immediately if possible.
      Wells PE: PE is the most likely diagnosis, nothing else applies
      Result
      3 points — PE unlikely (4 or less). NICE: D-dimer first; a negative result makes PE unlikely.
      PERC: 38 years old, heart rate 88, SaO₂ 98%, no other criteria, low suspicion
      Result
      0 of 8 criteria — PERC negative: no D-dimer test is needed.
      Revised Geneva: 70 years old, heart rate 100, one-sided leg pain
      Result
      1 + 5 + 3 = 9 points — intermediate (28% had PE); simplified 1 + 2 + 1 = 4, intermediate, PE likely (3 or more).
      Wells DVT: entire leg swollen, calf 4 cm larger, pitting oedema; cellulitis just as likely
      Result
      1 + 1 + 1 − 2 = 1 point — DVT unlikely. NICE: D-dimer test first.

      Common uses

      • Scoring a breathless or chest-pain patient in the emergency department before deciding between a D-dimer test and imaging.
      • Checking whether the PERC rule allows a low-risk patient to skip the D-dimer.
      • Documenting the score and the criteria behind it in the clinical notes.
      • Teaching or revising the criteria with the points beside each item.

      The criteria and their points

      • Wells PE (NICE two-level table): clinical signs and symptoms of DVT 3 · an alternative diagnosis less likely than PE 3 · heart rate over 100 1.5 · immobilisation for more than 3 days or surgery in the previous 4 weeks 1.5 · previous DVT or PE 1.5 · haemoptysis 1 · malignancy (on treatment, treated in the last 6 months, or palliative) 1. Maximum 12.5.
      • PERC: age 50 or over · heart rate 100 or more · SaO₂ below 95% · haemoptysis · oestrogen use · surgery or trauma requiring hospitalisation within 4 weeks · previous venous thromboembolism · unilateral leg swelling. PERC is negative only when none is present.
      • Revised Geneva: age over 65 1 · previous DVT or PE 3 · surgery or lower-limb fracture within a month 2 · active malignancy (or cured less than a year) 2 · unilateral lower-limb pain 3 · haemoptysis 2 · heart rate 75–94 3, or 95 or more 5 · pain on deep venous palpation of the leg with unilateral oedema 4. Maximum 22. The simplified score gives each item 1 point (heart rate 95 or more: 2), maximum 9.
      • Wells DVT (NICE two-level table): active cancer · paralysis, paresis or recent plaster of the leg · bedridden 3 days or more or major surgery within 12 weeks · localised tenderness along the deep veins · entire leg swollen · calf swelling 3 cm or more · pitting oedema of the symptomatic leg · collateral superficial veins · previously documented DVT — 1 point each; an alternative diagnosis at least as likely as DVT −2.

      Risk groups and what the studies found

      • Wells PE, two levels: 4 or less “PE unlikely”, more than 4 “PE likely”. In the derivation study 7.8% of “unlikely” patients had PE, and 2.2% with a negative D-dimer (1.7% on validation). In a later management study of 3,306 patients, “unlikely” with a normal D-dimer was followed by venous thromboembolism in 0.5% over 3 months.
      • Wells PE, three levels: below 2 low, 2–6 moderate, above 6 high — PE in 1.3%, 16.2% and 37.5% of 930 emergency department patients.
      • PERC: with a low gestalt suspicion (below 15%), PERC negative was followed by venous thromboembolism or death in 16 of 1,666 patients (1.0%) within 45 days — below the 2% the study set as its safety target.
      • Revised Geneva: 0–3 low, 4–10 intermediate, 11 or more high — PE in 8%, 28% and 74% of the validation set. Two levels: 5 or less unlikely, 6 or more likely.
      • Simplified Geneva: 0–1 low, 2–4 intermediate, 5 or more high — PE in 9.7%, 22.4% and 45.5% in its prospective validation of 1,621 patients. Two levels: 2 or less unlikely, 3 or more likely.
      • Wells DVT: 1 point or less “DVT unlikely”, 2 or more “DVT likely” (NICE). Three levels (0 or less, 1–2, 3 or more): DVT in 5.0%, 17% and 53% in a review of 14 studies with more than 8,000 outpatients.

      Next steps in NICE NG158

      • PE likely: a CT pulmonary angiogram (CTPA) immediately if possible — a V/Q SPECT or planar V/Q scan for people with contrast allergy, severe renal impairment (creatinine clearance below 30 ml/min) or a high risk from irradiation — and interim therapeutic anticoagulation if imaging is delayed.
      • PE unlikely: a D-dimer test with the result within 4 hours if possible (interim anticoagulation if not); a positive result leads to imaging, a negative one makes PE unlikely. An age-adjusted D-dimer threshold can be considered over 50.
      • DVT likely: a proximal leg vein ultrasound within 4 hours if possible, and a D-dimer if it is negative; a negative scan with a positive D-dimer is repeated 6 to 8 days later.
      • DVT unlikely: a D-dimer test within 4 hours; if positive, an ultrasound scan.
      • PERC: NICE suggests considering it when suspicion is low on the overall clinical impression and other diagnoses are feasible, and notes it has not been validated in people with COVID-19.

      Sources

      Limitations

      • Pre-test probability only: none of these rules diagnoses or excludes PE or DVT on its own — they decide which test comes next.
      • Each rule was derived and validated in a particular setting (Wells PE, PERC and Geneva in emergency departments, Wells DVT in outpatients). Elsewhere — hospital inpatients, for example — they are less certain.
      • Wells PE and Wells DVT include the clinician’s judgement of an alternative diagnosis, which carries 3 or −2 points.
      • PERC applies only when clinical suspicion is already low; it is not a substitute for the Wells or Geneva score in other patients.
      • It does not interpret D-dimer values: cut-offs depend on the assay and, for an age-adjusted threshold, on local practice.

      Privacy

      Everything happens in your browser. What you enter or open here is not uploaded or stored by MySmartCoPilot.

      Frequently asked questions

      Which should I use, the Wells score or the Geneva score?

      NICE NG158 recommends the two-level Wells scores for PE and DVT. The revised Geneva score is an alternative for PE that uses only objective findings — it has no “alternative diagnosis” judgement — and its simplified version had similar accuracy. Either way, the result decides between a D-dimer test and imaging.

      What does “PE unlikely” mean?

      A Wells score of 4 or less. In the derivation study 7.8% of these patients had PE, and with a negative D-dimer only 2.2% (1.7% on validation). NICE offers a D-dimer test to these patients and imaging to those whose D-dimer is positive.

      When can I use the PERC rule?

      Only when your overall clinical suspicion of PE is already low — in the validation study, a gestalt estimate below 15%. If none of the 8 criteria is present, PE is ruled out without a D-dimer test (1.0% had venous thromboembolism or died within 45 days). If any criterion is present, PERC does not apply and you score Wells or Geneva instead.

      Why are there two-level and three-level versions?

      Wells derived both from the same data: the three-level version (low, moderate, high) estimates the probability of PE; the two-level version (likely or unlikely) was designed to be combined with a D-dimer test, so that “unlikely” plus a negative D-dimer safely excludes PE. NICE uses the two-level versions.

      Does a high score mean the patient has PE or DVT?

      No. A high score raises the probability — in the Wells studies 37.5% of high-probability patients had PE — but only imaging confirms or excludes it. A low score lowers the probability but does not exclude it without the right test.

      Is the information I enter sent anywhere?

      No. The scores are calculated in your browser; nothing you tick is uploaded or stored.

      Quick answers and tool search

      Type to search tools or to get a quick answer, for example 18% of 2500. Use the up and down arrow keys to move through the results, Enter to choose, and Escape to close.